Five mayoral prospects weigh in on renewing the EMO contracts
What advice would Philadelphia’s next mayor have for the School Reform Commission on what to do about the contracts with education management organizations expiring in 2007? We invited responses and heard from five of the city’s current and prospective mayoral candidates on the following question:
Should the EMO contracts be renewed in 2007? Why or why not?
As one of the chief architects of the legislation that led to the creation of the School Reform Commission, the hiring of CEO Paul Vallas, and the establishment of the diversity of choices currently offered by the District, I am pleased with the growth in test scores over the past five years. This growth is due, in part, to the broad range of options afforded to parents in the District, including schools run by education management organizations (EMOs).
As the contracts for EMOs expire, the providers that are meeting accountability standards should be renewed, and the providers that are not should be terminated. I support whatever model leads to the most children achieving; be it public, independent, charter, or partnership school, the only results that matter are whether or not children are learning, parents are seeing progress, and our highest expectations are being met.
State Representative Dwight Evans
Any decision on renewing these EMO contracts should be based on results. We have four years under this system, and so far the results for these for-profit operators have been disappointing.
The District's restructured schools and its regular schools have outpaced the EMO schools, even though the EMOs have received far more dollars per student.
I continue to have serious reservations about for-profit companies such as Edison. The EMOs are no magic bullet for our schools and our children.
Congressman Chaka Fattah
Only 55.5 percent of ninth graders in the Philadelphia School District will graduate. Of those who do not graduate, 78 percent cannot expect to be gainfully employed. Too many classrooms lack the necessary textbooks, schools buildings are aging and need to be replaced, and the funding for critically important positions – such as librarians and teacher’s aides – are continually in jeopardy. Philadelphia can, and must, do better for our children.


How should the District make up for the 

Comments (0)
Post new comment