School District Budget 101: Follow the money
by Ron Whitehorne and Yulanda Essoka
Where does the School District get the money to operate Philadelphia's schools, and how does it spend it?
As the city's parents, students, and residents face another looming budget deficit that threatens cutbacks in school programs, these are important questions to consider.
They also take on added importance in an election year. All the candidates promise to fix the schools, but where will they get the money and what choices will they make about how to spend it?
What is the purpose of a school district budget?
The budget represents a plan for receiving and expending money. It tells the governing school body, its employees, and the public how much the district can spend during the year and for what purposes. It projects how much revenue will come from what sources.
The budget also satisfies a minimum level of financial and program information for local, state, and federal governments – requirements imposed by law. State law requires each school district to budget its income and expenses every year and to make the budget available for public inspection before final adoption.
There are actually two different school district budgets: the capital budget, which deals with long-term items like school construction, and the operating budget, which covers the day-to-day costs of running the school system. The capital budget is funded primarily by the sale of bonds. School districts essentially borrow the money and pay it off with interest over a long period, much like a homeowner pays off a mortgage.
In Philadelphia, it is the operating budget, which depends on revenue raised by taxation, that is facing a deficit. The budget is drawn up and then approved by the School Reform Commission every year, no later than May 31.
Philadelphia's School District budget is more than numbers. It is a record of the District's past decisions and goals. It is by looking at the budget, rather than simply listening to the pronouncements of School District officials and politicians, that we get a handle on education policy priorities.
To take just one example, charter schools are now a significant chunk of the School District budget, totaling over $266 million dollars (10 percent) in the 2007-08 budget. Nearly all that money goes out in payments to charter schools. In contrast, the School District's two-person charter school office, which is responsible for overseeing the city's 60 charter schools and ensuring that they comply with the law, does not appear to be a budgetary priority. Its budget of $300,000 pays for a director, a secretary, and expenses.
Where the money comes from
In Pennsylvania, schools obtain funds primarily from local property taxes supplemented by state aid (and to a much lesser extent federal aid). This means that wealthier communities can afford to spend more than poor towns and cities. The wealthiest suburbs spend up to twice as much on each student as the city spends.
The state: State assistance is based on a complicated set of historical and other factors that result in more money going to poorer communities. In the early 1990s, the state stopped using a funding formula and started making its allocations to districts based on adjustments to the prior year's funding level. For years, this change resulted in less funding for Philadelphia.






Comments (1)
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 02/14/2009 - 16:06.
Hello "Notebook" contributors,As a Chicago District 299 residents, I find your101 class lesson for informing the public aboutthe "budget" quite interesting.I also would like to respectfully comment onthe set-aside grant funds received in your district over the last seven years to support the role of parents and the community as partners withtheir local level Title I School.The Bush Administration when reauthorizingthe amendments of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) includeda new provision that I opted to call theHEART of the NCLB Act.Under the terms of Title I - Part A subpart oneSection 1118, Parental Involvement of the presentNo Child Left Behind Act, (NCLB) a designated amount of funds ( a minimum of 1% of what the district receives)was to be set aside for parental involvementactivities. NEW PROVISION underthe amendments of the NCLB Actstated that 95% of the 1% was to go "directly" to the local level Title I schools. ( Section 1118 (3. C ) Section 1118 (3 B.)states that Parents were / shall be included in the decisions of how the fundswould be used to support their reasonable and necessary expenses when havingmeetings as an organized body of parentsor as parents period. Section 1118 wasto also be shared so it could be explainedwhere the funds came from and how they could be used. This range wasto also include support for parenting skillsand literacy needs. It covers bus transportation,childcare costs and basically allowed for areal venue of support for the plight of the"working poor" and the obstacles theyfact when they cannot be selective withhow they spend their time., Working was never an option over the last8 years it was required and while some maysay that has always been the case, notethat the home composition has been greatly altered because of our economy.
Title I Funds come into a school districtbecause of two factors - CENSUS informationand the school lunch forms. Let me be correctthat is the formula in Chicago District 299.
It may be different in Philadelphia.
Please include in your next "Notebook" issueinformation about how your district has utilizedthe seven (7) years of funds the parents andcommunity received to support their roleas partners working with the schools.Pro- and Con would be appreciated.I will also share what is being done inChicago.
Thank you,O. Lewis
Post new comment